Creating An Interdisciplinary Unit
Creating a unit for an integrated classroom is more of a
challenge than it seems to be. In groups, our fourth Year University level
class struggles with creating a few activities or lessons that encompass
multiple subject and level material. We are given the steps to create, the
tools and the guidelines. But for some reason, we just can’t seem to get it. I
have been told, “it will become easier”. This makes me wonder if what is being
described as “easier”, is a synonym for the words, “less important”, “unnecessary”
or “systematic”. And that is a sad
thing.
Teachers should not become less engaged in the lessons that
they are preparing and teaching, just because they have done it multiple times.
How can we expect our student’s to be interested in what we are saying if we
aren’t even interested in it ourselves? The teacher has the responsibility to
assess the relationships within the group, the types of learners and the
ability of the students while preparing a lesson. In addition, the teacher
should be familiar with the social and personal attributes of the class and
should try to cater to their needs and interests. This can be related back to
Chapter 2: Know Your Curriculum and Know Your Students. With that being said;
lesson preparation should never be an easy task, because each group of students
will be unique and dynamically different.
So, maybe that answers the question as to why we, as a group, are having such a
difficult time in preparing a lesson plan for students- maybe we are trying to
organize our thoughts and ideas into something that would fit our learning
styles and needs. The question is still not completely answered as to why this
task is so daunting. I believe that the root of the problem is in our
post-secondary education system. As students, planning to teach Senior and
Intermediate level classes, we are bombarded with high-level classes of our
teachable subjects. This is definitely something that will benefit our learning
experience but I am not convinced that it will necessary make us better
teachers. In this way, we are never challenged to think, deconstruct or prepare
our own thoughts. Through these core-subject area subjects (in many cases), we
are taught and trained to regurgitate and learn for short-term. Unfortunately,
this type of system has made many students “grade conscious”. This means that
we are no longer focused on the process of learning or the relevance of the
information we are told, but rather our attention has focused acing the final
evaluation. I can only hope for the future of my siblings, future children and
grandchildren, that this model be diminished. We, as future educators, are at
the front lines of change. By creating lesson plan models that work to engage
the student, this problem can be avoided.
![]() |
http://www.pehpot.com/2012/02/grade-conscious-mommy.html |
As concurrent
education students, we are taught the Backwards Design as a format for
preparing a lesson plan, or unit. This
is an interesting approach, as it highlights the importance of the “big ideas’
of the subject. In an interdisciplinary model, the big ideas of the arrangement
of subjects are explored. This idea can be integrated into any subject area or
curriculum. The tools of an exploratory web, curriculum scan and cluster,
curriculum unpacking charts, and the Know-Do-Be umbrella. Following these
planning steps, the second stage involves creating an RPAT (Rich Performance
Assessment Task). In the RPAT students
are given the opportunity to see what they have learned and can put their
learning’s into practice. Within this, teachers must create reasonable and
reliable assessment tools. The final stage is creating an essential questions
web; in which a ‘reflect’ is implemented. Teachers use this opportunity to
reflect on the lessons and unit plans they have created, creating a web of
ideas, assessments, activities, outcomes and finally, the KDB related.
Through effective, proper and genuine lesson planning, the future
of the education system can be a bright one. Unfortunately, if we instill the
type of learning we have experienced in our post-secondary education, the
chance of engaging students is bleak.
Yes in this age of technology, the chance of engaging students is BLEAK. That is why integrated curriculum can lessen that probability because it can promote deep learning about relevant issues. Why is the design process so hard? Because I submit it is a new way of thinking and like a new language it is challenging to think differently. Once you learn to see the Big Picture and the much littler one then the process becomes easier. And that doesn't mean being bored by the curriculum design at all. In fact, it makes it much more fulfilling. And with the artful use of technology you can truly engage students (methinks). But Ela, I must have this wrong but I thought you only handed in a curriculum that was subject-based? Did I miss something? Please talk to me.
ReplyDelete