Thursday, 25 September 2014

Assessing our ability to broaden horizons



What would the education system look like if all grades were eliminated? If the only driving force for people to work hard, learn and explore was their own internal motivation? I sat down and tried to picture a classroom of this kind. I surprised myself by how many problems I could address right off the bat. With time and a little bit more critical thinking, I was able to distinguish the inevitable problem; I am a product of the Old Story, the grade-driven way of teaching and learning. As long as I, and others, continue on with this mentality, there will be no change in the system. And that can be a frightening thing. When we begin to learn, as a means of an end- for the sole reason of completing an assignment, passing a test, getting a grade or getting a diploma, we are only fooling ourselves. School provides so much more for us than what many see it for.

I speak personally when I say that from school I have learned the importance of socialization, work ethics, time-management, problem solving, critical thinking skills and many, many more. I can honestly say that I have learned something I consider of value from every class I have ever sat through. And when one considers this critically, why would ‘we’ (as a group), sit through something that we considered useless? In this case, we have accepted the unacceptable and have become passive participants in our own education. If the motivation of school is a means to an ends- I suspect we will not get very far. Without having genuine interest, motivation or willingness to “try something new”, the education system has failed us- or rather, we have failed ourselves.

In the first 20 seconds of the video this exact idea is illustrated. The student is not engaged in class, gets lost, doesn't do well on the test and then does it all over again. The grade-driven mentality is everywhere.

If I were to ask everyone in our class of 73 how many people have taken a course, received a good grade, but have little knowledge on what they actually learned. This is where the major difference between memorizing, understandings and, inevitably, learning, is highlighted. Through the strategies outlined in Chapter 2 and 3, teachers can reach out to students, help them become engaged and most importantly, follow along the process of their learning. This is the Do and Be. Through the implementation of the popsicle sticks that were used last week in class, we were all given an equal chance to answer the questions outlined in front of us. This technique is not only a way of conducting a lesson, but it is also a tool for assessment. The teacher/professor is given the opportunity to gauge the level of understanding of individual students, but also the class as whole. This is considered ‘Assessment for Learning’. Assessment for learning is when assessment is a tool for educators to use in order to learn about their students learning processes. This is a continuous assessment tool that brings the issues to the forefront before the problems become out of hand.

http://rickgreen.com/constitution-alive-a-once-in-a-lifetime-historical-opportunity/sleeping-at-desk/
There are other strategies outlined by Black and Williams (1998) that demonstrate the assessment for learning techniques and put them into practice. The “no-hands” approach is one that highlights the importance of a classroom for collaborative learning, taking the focus off of the right answer, but rather the development of understanding and the process of learning.  These are two tools that we, as future educators, need to be aware of and willing to try, if that is what our students need. We cannot be close-minded and grade-driven, or else our beliefs and values will be instilled upon our students, creating a downwards spiral.

Through our (generalization as a group) unwillingness to try new things, we have committed ourselves to the idea that learning is a “means to an ends” and that a good final evaluation is the end goal. Earlier, that is exactly what I addressed as being part of the old story. As soon as we begin to see learning as a way to discover, create and cater to our genuine interests, we will discover the value in learning. I know I am naïve and inexperienced and that is why my mind is open to the teachings of the New Story and the possibilities of the future.

Last week I wrote about “trying something new” and taking the chance to broaden horizons, explore, create and learn. This week, I challenge everyone to “try” some of these assessment tools discussed above; whether that means actively thinking about it, preparing for it, understanding its implication, or participating in it. We may surprise ourselves from the things we discover.


1 comment:

  1. Ela – you nave a lot packed into this blog. I really like your attitude and that you have looked at things like the seminal work of Black and Wiliam (1998). There is only one thing I would challenge you on. Do you have to be naïve and inexperienced to be open to a new story?? I don’t think so. I so think it is a matter of personality some times. Some folks like change better than others. Some people are more willing to take risks – seems to be something about out DNA – the T factor. So how to we get people to try something new? The answer to that is still a mystery in spite of what some researchers recommend. Keep pushing into new territory. ☺

    ReplyDelete